Sunday, November 24, 2019
Free Essays on EUs Trade Policy
EU's Trade Policy Towards Developing Countries Is Most Liberal Where Poor Countries Can Least Compete And Most Restrictive In Areas They Could Best Compete In?03 ââ¬ËThe EUââ¬â¢s Trade Policy Towards Developing Countries is Most Liberal Where Countries Are Least Competitive and Most Restrictive Where Poor Countries Could Best Compete.ââ¬â¢ Explain and Comment From its inception the EU was essentially about trade and the European stateââ¬â¢s empire- building past led to trade preferences being sought for particular former colonies. The accession of the UK into the EU in 1973 further exacerbated the issue and led to the first Lome Convention being signed ââ¬Ëto recognise the former Commonwealth less developed countries (LDCs)ââ¬â¢ and replace the Yanode Convention, which had mainly ââ¬Ëbenefited ex French coloniesââ¬â¢ (McDonald & Deraden, 1999: 334). The signing of Lome I led to ââ¬Ëboth sides claiming it was qualitatively different from anything that had gone beforeââ¬â¢ and a step in the direction of ââ¬Ëa New International Economic Orderââ¬â¢ that would make developed and developing countries ââ¬Ëequal partnersââ¬â¢ Stevens 1984 (George & Bache, 2001: 388). With hindsight we can see that Lome I and its successors did not live up to their hype and the Treaty of the European Union recognised this when it c autiously stated the EUââ¬â¢s objectives as being ââ¬Ëto foster sustainable economic and social development in the worldââ¬â¢s poorest countriesââ¬â¢ and to ââ¬Ëpromote their smooth and gradual integration into the global economyââ¬â¢ (Dinan, 1999:504). The EU faces the difficulty of promoting its member states interests and industries whilst supporting LDCs economies and the results of the Lome Conventions and the General System of Preferences (GSP) has been varied. Generally Lome 1 was regarded as ââ¬Ëinadequateââ¬â¢ and criticised for ââ¬Ëfalling short of what African Caribbean and Pecific (ACP) states had hoped forââ¬â¢ (George & Bache, 2001: 389). Galtung arg... Free Essays on EU's Trade Policy Free Essays on EU's Trade Policy EU's Trade Policy Towards Developing Countries Is Most Liberal Where Poor Countries Can Least Compete And Most Restrictive In Areas They Could Best Compete In?03 ââ¬ËThe EUââ¬â¢s Trade Policy Towards Developing Countries is Most Liberal Where Countries Are Least Competitive and Most Restrictive Where Poor Countries Could Best Compete.ââ¬â¢ Explain and Comment From its inception the EU was essentially about trade and the European stateââ¬â¢s empire- building past led to trade preferences being sought for particular former colonies. The accession of the UK into the EU in 1973 further exacerbated the issue and led to the first Lome Convention being signed ââ¬Ëto recognise the former Commonwealth less developed countries (LDCs)ââ¬â¢ and replace the Yanode Convention, which had mainly ââ¬Ëbenefited ex French coloniesââ¬â¢ (McDonald & Deraden, 1999: 334). The signing of Lome I led to ââ¬Ëboth sides claiming it was qualitatively different from anything that had gone beforeââ¬â¢ and a step in the direction of ââ¬Ëa New International Economic Orderââ¬â¢ that would make developed and developing countries ââ¬Ëequal partnersââ¬â¢ Stevens 1984 (George & Bache, 2001: 388). With hindsight we can see that Lome I and its successors did not live up to their hype and the Treaty of the European Union recognised this when it c autiously stated the EUââ¬â¢s objectives as being ââ¬Ëto foster sustainable economic and social development in the worldââ¬â¢s poorest countriesââ¬â¢ and to ââ¬Ëpromote their smooth and gradual integration into the global economyââ¬â¢ (Dinan, 1999:504). The EU faces the difficulty of promoting its member states interests and industries whilst supporting LDCs economies and the results of the Lome Conventions and the General System of Preferences (GSP) has been varied. Generally Lome 1 was regarded as ââ¬Ëinadequateââ¬â¢ and criticised for ââ¬Ëfalling short of what African Caribbean and Pecific (ACP) states had hoped forââ¬â¢ (George & Bache, 2001: 389). Galtung arg...
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.